HOME   |  MY PRODUCTS   |  SALES   |  ABOUT US    |  CONTACT US   |  SITE MAP

Educator ToolsTraining and SupportProduct InformationLibrarian SpotFree Trials
 
  History Happenings: Obama Wins the Prize

Bookmark and Share

Obama Wins the Prize
World Conflicts Today


Most critics and supporters of the Nobel Committee's decision to award U.S. president Barack Obama the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 agreed that Obama was chosen based on his potential and intangible accomplishments rather than on any concrete victories for peace. Of course, they strongly disagreed as to the appropriateness of such a rationale.

In this new activity from World Conflicts Today (get a trial), read about reactions to Obama's win and debate the effectiveness of multilateralism and diplomacy in solving today's foreign policy challenges.
The announcement of Obama's Nobel Prize win, which apparently surprised the president himself, provoked a wide array of reactions across the globe, ranging from the congratulatory to the derisive:
"In less than a year in office, he [Obama] has transformed the way we look at ourselves and the world we live in and rekindled hope for a world at peace with itself."
Mohamed al-Baradei, director general of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency

"The Nobel committee was fairly explicit that Obama's hope of achieving peace was all that was required, presumably making countless Miss Universe contestants equally eligible... As with all things Obama, it's far better to bet on a hopeful vision than to wait around for what are inevitably becoming disappointing results."
Tony Fratto, deputy assistant to George W. Bush
In the words of the Norwegian Nobel Committee themselves, they awarded the prize to Obama for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," and for his "work for a world without nuclear weapons."

Obama's emphasis on diplomacy and a nuclear-free world were both on display in a speech he gave in Prague on April 5, 2009, in which he called for world cooperation on nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation measures. But events on the same day in North Korea demonstrated how challenging Obama's goals would be, as Pyongyang attempted to test a long-range ballistic missile and subsequently kicked out UN inspectors.

NORTH KOREAN MISSILE LAUNCH (4/09)
TELEVISIONS IN DOWNTOWN SEOUL CARRY THE STORY OF THE
NORTH KOREAN MISSILE LAUNCH — Seoul, South Korea, April 5, 2009.
(© 2009 Getty Images, Inc.)


With North Koreans giving the Obama administration mixed signals, the Israelis and Palestinians still at a standoff, intensified tribal clashes in southern Sudan, renewed sectarian violence in Iraq, and ongoing troubles in Afghanistan, is the promise of a commitment to multilateralism and diplomacy form the most powerful president in the world worthy of a peace prize? How might the prize help (or hurt) Obama's attempts to resolve the above conflicts?
Activity
In order to answer these questions, pretend you are on the Norwegian Nobel Committee. The committee has five members (appointed by the Norwegian parliament), who are directed by a statement in Alfred Nobel's will that instructs the Nobel Peace Prize to be awarded "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."
  1. Break into groups of five and assign each committee member a conflict that involves the United States from World Conflicts Today:

  2. For background, read the Overview section of your assigned conflict. Then carefully study the Obstacles and Global Implications sections with an aim to answering these questions:

    • How might U.S.-led diplomacy and multilateralism help overcome the obstacles to resolving this conflict?

    • When (if ever) might the use of force be necessary to do so?

    • How would the resolution of this conflict, or progress toward such a resolution, positively affect prospects for world peace?

    You might also review relevant History sections, especially Recent Events, to see how the United States has dealt with your assigned conflict.

  3. Come together as a committee and discuss your findings. Based on your answers to the above questions, do you think that Obama's commitment to multilateralism and diplomatic engagement outweigh the relative lack of progress he has made so far in resolving conflicts from Afghanistan to the Palestinian Territories?

  4. After everyone has had a chance to share their views, take a committee vote on whether to award Obama the prize. If you vote against Obama, propose a recipient who you think deserves the prize in his place.

PROQUEST SUPPORTS EDUCATION | TOOLS & RESOURCES

See how ProQuest supports the Lexile Framework for Reading ProQuest offers digital library resources that are aligned directly to learning standard benchmarks ProQuest supports 21st-century Information Literacy Skills ProQuest provides reference solutions that address differentiated instruction in the classroom ProQuest offers digital library resources that are aligned directly to learning standard benchmarks

  MY PRODUCTS   |  SALES   |  ABOUT US    |  CONTACT US   |  SITE MAP

© 2010 ProQuest LLC All rights reserved.